<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 620 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169781</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling Section 22-A of the Registration Act unconstitutional and invalidating related notifications. It emphasized that essential legislative powers cannot be delegated without clear guidelines and that the judiciary, not the executive, should interpret public policy. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and previous decisions under similar notifications by other states were not to be revisited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 620 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169781</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, ruling Section 22-A of the Registration Act unconstitutional and invalidating related notifications. It emphasized that essential legislative powers cannot be delegated without clear guidelines and that the judiciary, not the executive, should interpret public policy. The appeal was dismissed without costs, and previous decisions under similar notifications by other states were not to be revisited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>