https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169779 The Supreme Court held that the complaint under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Indian Penal Code was unsustainable as essential elements of the offenses were missing. The Court emphasized that the High Court should have exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the complaint, as the allegations were baseless and filed with an oblique motive. Consequently, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and the complaint was quashed, leading to the allowance and disposal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 09:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169779 The Supreme Court held that the complaint under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Indian Penal Code was unsustainable as essential elements of the offenses were missing. The Court emphasized that the High Court should have exercised its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the complaint, as the allegations were baseless and filed with an oblique motive. Consequently, the High Court's judgment was set aside, and the complaint was quashed, leading to the allowance and disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169779