<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 95 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that they were eligible for the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption based on the ownership of brand names &quot;Decotouch&quot; and &quot;Diamond Gold&quot; through valid assignment deeds. The Tribunal noted the department&#039;s failure to identify owners of other brand names used by the appellant, indicating that goods bearing those names should not be denied SSI exemption. The pre-deposit requirement for the appeal was waived, with the Tribunal deeming the amount already paid sufficient, and stayed the recovery of the balance amount of duty demand, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 06:44:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 95 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that they were eligible for the Small Scale Industries (SSI) exemption based on the ownership of brand names &quot;Decotouch&quot; and &quot;Diamond Gold&quot; through valid assignment deeds. The Tribunal noted the department&#039;s failure to identify owners of other brand names used by the appellant, indicating that goods bearing those names should not be denied SSI exemption. The pre-deposit requirement for the appeal was waived, with the Tribunal deeming the amount already paid sufficient, and stayed the recovery of the balance amount of duty demand, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>