https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259215 Disciplinary proceedings were vitiated because the member was denied a fair hearing: the committee proceeded ex parte after refusing an adjournment sought on medical grounds, despite the rules requiring compliance with natural justice and contemplating at least one adjournment before proceeding in absence. The earlier refusal of an adjournment did not justify rejection of the later request, and the compressed single hearing did not give an effective opportunity to meet the material or evidence. The availability of an appellate remedy did not bar writ jurisdiction where denial of fair hearing was established, so writ interference was justified. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 08:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259215 Disciplinary proceedings were vitiated because the member was denied a fair hearing: the committee proceeded ex parte after refusing an adjournment sought on medical grounds, despite the rules requiring compliance with natural justice and contemplating at least one adjournment before proceeding in absence. The earlier refusal of an adjournment did not justify rejection of the later request, and the compressed single hearing did not give an effective opportunity to meet the material or evidence. The availability of an appellate remedy did not bar writ jurisdiction where denial of fair hearing was established, so writ interference was justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259215