<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 86 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259212</link>
    <description>Additions based only on third-party seized papers were held unsustainable where the documents were not found from the assessee&#039;s possession or books and no corroborative material linked the assessee to the alleged transactions. The Court accepted the concurrent factual finding that the third party denied authorship of the loose sheets and denied any cash dealings with the assessee or related entities. Presumptions under the Income-tax Act relating to seized material could not be invoked against a stranger to the documents without independent supporting evidence, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 06:43:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 86 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259212</link>
      <description>Additions based only on third-party seized papers were held unsustainable where the documents were not found from the assessee&#039;s possession or books and no corroborative material linked the assessee to the alleged transactions. The Court accepted the concurrent factual finding that the third party denied authorship of the loose sheets and denied any cash dealings with the assessee or related entities. Presumptions under the Income-tax Act relating to seized material could not be invoked against a stranger to the documents without independent supporting evidence, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>