<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259207</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment challenged an allegation of accommodation entries for alleged unaccounted loans; court found payments made by account payee cheques, interest paid with TDS and returns filed, and particulars already furnished. The HC concluded the loans were taken in the regular course of business and documentary evidence did not show escaped income, rejecting the revenue&#039;s affidavit contentions. Consequently the proposed reopening was unjustified and the reassessment notice was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 81 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259207</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment challenged an allegation of accommodation entries for alleged unaccounted loans; court found payments made by account payee cheques, interest paid with TDS and returns filed, and particulars already furnished. The HC concluded the loans were taken in the regular course of business and documentary evidence did not show escaped income, rejecting the revenue&#039;s affidavit contentions. Consequently the proposed reopening was unjustified and the reassessment notice was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>