<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 74 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259200</link>
    <description>The court found the failure to regularize the petitioner&#039;s services, after nearly fifteen years of continuous work, compared to others with similar tenure, to be arbitrary and a violation of human rights. The court directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders based on internal communication from 2007 within a specified time frame, emphasizing the importance of the petitioner&#039;s case. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 06:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 74 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259200</link>
      <description>The court found the failure to regularize the petitioner&#039;s services, after nearly fifteen years of continuous work, compared to others with similar tenure, to be arbitrary and a violation of human rights. The court directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders based on internal communication from 2007 within a specified time frame, emphasizing the importance of the petitioner&#039;s case. The writ petition was disposed of with this directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>