<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169767</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the process issuance order against the accused for cheating. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with Section 202 of the Cr.P.C., requiring an inquiry before issuing a process, especially when the accused resides outside the Magistrate&#039;s jurisdiction. The Supreme Court directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conduct a proper inquiry as mandated by the amended Section 202 within two months, rather than quashing the complaint outright.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2015 17:05:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 965 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169767</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the process issuance order against the accused for cheating. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with Section 202 of the Cr.P.C., requiring an inquiry before issuing a process, especially when the accused resides outside the Magistrate&#039;s jurisdiction. The Supreme Court directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate to conduct a proper inquiry as mandated by the amended Section 202 within two months, rather than quashing the complaint outright.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>