<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 749 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169763</link>
    <description>In matrimonial cruelty prosecutions, proceedings against a sister-in-law may be quashed where the complaint and charge-sheet disclose only rude conduct, insults, or derogatory remarks and not the essential ingredients of cruelty, dowry coercion, misappropriation, or abetment of unlawful demand. Limitation for cognizance of the matrimonial offences was not treated as fatal because the complaint was lodged within time and the later delay was condoned on a liberal, justice-oriented reading of the saving provision. On territorial jurisdiction, no offence was shown to have been committed at Trichy, and the proper forum for the criminal case and connected matrimonial proceeding was Chennai, so transfer was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 21:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 749 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169763</link>
      <description>In matrimonial cruelty prosecutions, proceedings against a sister-in-law may be quashed where the complaint and charge-sheet disclose only rude conduct, insults, or derogatory remarks and not the essential ingredients of cruelty, dowry coercion, misappropriation, or abetment of unlawful demand. Limitation for cognizance of the matrimonial offences was not treated as fatal because the complaint was lodged within time and the later delay was condoned on a liberal, justice-oriented reading of the saving provision. On territorial jurisdiction, no offence was shown to have been committed at Trichy, and the proper forum for the criminal case and connected matrimonial proceeding was Chennai, so transfer was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>