https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169762 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, emphasizing the importance of analyzing admissions and unique facts in each case. The decision highlighted that ownership of reserved trees lies with the landowner, not the government, as per the Karnataka Forest Act. The appeal was allowed without costs, stressing the need to clear obstacles to justice and cautioning against blindly following precedents without considering individual case specifics. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2015 21:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169762 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment, emphasizing the importance of analyzing admissions and unique facts in each case. The decision highlighted that ownership of reserved trees lies with the landowner, not the government, as per the Karnataka Forest Act. The appeal was allowed without costs, stressing the need to clear obstacles to justice and cautioning against blindly following precedents without considering individual case specifics. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169762