https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169758 In construing the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1951, factual inclusion of land in the relevant revenue register was sufficient to treat it as an "estate"; the Court refused to add a requirement that the entry must also have been validly made under the earlier registration law, so that contention failed. On the second issue, the prior compromise decree operated as estoppel because the appellant's status as holder of a permanently settled estate had been directly in issue in the earlier proceedings; the compromise and surrounding pleadings showed that the parties accepted that foundational status, so the contrary challenge was barred. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2015 16:53:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169758 In construing the Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1951, factual inclusion of land in the relevant revenue register was sufficient to treat it as an "estate"; the Court refused to add a requirement that the entry must also have been validly made under the earlier registration law, so that contention failed. On the second issue, the prior compromise decree operated as estoppel because the appellant's status as holder of a permanently settled estate had been directly in issue in the earlier proceedings; the compromise and surrounding pleadings showed that the parties accepted that foundational status, so the contrary challenge was barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Feb 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169758