<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169753</link>
    <description>Renewal of quarry leases over forest land after the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is subject to prior approval of the Central Government because continued quarrying amounts to use of forest land for a non-forest purpose and may further deforestation. The renewal provisions in the Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules, 1966 do not create an absolute right to renewal where later central conservation legislation imposes a mandatory approval regime. The earlier precedent on mining in already broken-up land was distinguished, as these matters concerned renewal of quarry leases rather than mere continuation of pre-existing mining operations. Refusal to renew was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 365 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169753</link>
      <description>Renewal of quarry leases over forest land after the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is subject to prior approval of the Central Government because continued quarrying amounts to use of forest land for a non-forest purpose and may further deforestation. The renewal provisions in the Gujarat Minor Mineral Rules, 1966 do not create an absolute right to renewal where later central conservation legislation imposes a mandatory approval regime. The earlier precedent on mining in already broken-up land was distinguished, as these matters concerned renewal of quarry leases rather than mere continuation of pre-existing mining operations. Refusal to renew was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>