<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169745</link>
    <description>A retracted confession recorded under Section 164 CrPC can support conviction only if it was made voluntarily, truthfully, and without threat, coercion, inducement, or police influence, with the statutory safeguards followed in letter and spirit. The Court emphasised that short reflection time, lack of meaningful legal assistance, and surrounding inconsistencies may undermine reliability. Once retracted, the confession requires independent corroborative circumstances forming a chain pointing only to guilt; absent such corroboration, it cannot safely be the sole basis of conviction. On the facts described, the record did not supply adequate corroboration, so the finding of guilt was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 622 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169745</link>
      <description>A retracted confession recorded under Section 164 CrPC can support conviction only if it was made voluntarily, truthfully, and without threat, coercion, inducement, or police influence, with the statutory safeguards followed in letter and spirit. The Court emphasised that short reflection time, lack of meaningful legal assistance, and surrounding inconsistencies may undermine reliability. Once retracted, the confession requires independent corroborative circumstances forming a chain pointing only to guilt; absent such corroboration, it cannot safely be the sole basis of conviction. On the facts described, the record did not supply adequate corroboration, so the finding of guilt was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>