https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169744 A pre-Constitution procedural regulation is not wholly invalid after the Constitution merely because one provision is discriminatory; only the inconsistent part is inoperative if the accused was not deprived of the substance of equal procedural protection. The exclusion of committal proceedings and use of warrant procedure did not amount to substantial procedural inequality, the transfer power remained intact, and the restriction on revision applied only to non-appealable sentences. The withdrawal of confirmation for death sentences was discriminatory and invalid to that extent, but the defect was severable and did not affect the conviction. Delegation of authority to make over cases by reference to office, rather than personal naming, was valid. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2015 12:43:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169744 A pre-Constitution procedural regulation is not wholly invalid after the Constitution merely because one provision is discriminatory; only the inconsistent part is inoperative if the accused was not deprived of the substance of equal procedural protection. The exclusion of committal proceedings and use of warrant procedure did not amount to substantial procedural inequality, the transfer power remained intact, and the restriction on revision applied only to non-appealable sentences. The withdrawal of confirmation for death sentences was discriminatory and invalid to that extent, but the defect was severable and did not affect the conviction. Delegation of authority to make over cases by reference to office, rather than personal naming, was valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Mar 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169744