https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169742 A claim for damages for wrongful detention of specific movable property is governed by the applicable Limitation Act periods for such claims, and time begins when the property is wrongfully taken, injured, or the detention becomes unlawful. The mere persistence of detention or continuing loss does not convert the claim into a continuing wrong. Where the claimant knew of the alleged deprivation on the date possession was taken and filed the counterclaim several years later, limitation barred the claim. Earlier litigation concerning title and possession did not revive or create a fresh cause of action for damages because the wrongful detention claim was distinct from that suit. en-us Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169742 A claim for damages for wrongful detention of specific movable property is governed by the applicable Limitation Act periods for such claims, and time begins when the property is wrongfully taken, injured, or the detention becomes unlawful. The mere persistence of detention or continuing loss does not convert the claim into a continuing wrong. Where the claimant knew of the alleged deprivation on the date possession was taken and filed the counterclaim several years later, limitation barred the claim. Earlier litigation concerning title and possession did not revive or create a fresh cause of action for damages because the wrongful detention claim was distinct from that suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169742