<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 1211 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169739</link>
    <description>Minimum guaranteed electricity charges linked to 40% of contract load were treated as dependent on the Board making supply available to that extent; where supply itself was insufficient, the consumer&#039;s liability could not be enforced without first determining the actual supply position. The Court also accepted that the High Court&#039;s declaration of law could operate prospectively because retrospective application would disrupt a public utility&#039;s tariff structure and supply arrangements. The individual disputes were remitted for factual examination on actual supply, with consequential relief to follow from that finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2015 12:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 1211 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169739</link>
      <description>Minimum guaranteed electricity charges linked to 40% of contract load were treated as dependent on the Board making supply available to that extent; where supply itself was insufficient, the consumer&#039;s liability could not be enforced without first determining the actual supply position. The Court also accepted that the High Court&#039;s declaration of law could operate prospectively because retrospective application would disrupt a public utility&#039;s tariff structure and supply arrangements. The individual disputes were remitted for factual examination on actual supply, with consequential relief to follow from that finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>