https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169740 In an appeal against acquittal under Article 136, interference is justified only where the acquittal is shown to be perverse, improper, or otherwise unsustainable on the evidence. The Court held that reinforced presumption of innocence applied after acquittal, and alleged factual or legal errors were insufficient on their own to disturb the High Court's view. Although the surrounding circumstances created grave suspicion, the material did not compel a finding of homicidal death, other possibilities remained open, and the participation of the other respondents was not independently proved. The acquittal was therefore not disturbed because murder was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2015 12:02:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169740 In an appeal against acquittal under Article 136, interference is justified only where the acquittal is shown to be perverse, improper, or otherwise unsustainable on the evidence. The Court held that reinforced presumption of innocence applied after acquittal, and alleged factual or legal errors were insufficient on their own to disturb the High Court's view. Although the surrounding circumstances created grave suspicion, the material did not compel a finding of homicidal death, other possibilities remained open, and the participation of the other respondents was not independently proved. The acquittal was therefore not disturbed because murder was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Nov 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169740