https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259181 The Tribunal addressed the non-payment of Central Excise duty by the appellant and the dispute over payment during default periods without utilizing Cenvat credit. It clarified the constitutional validity of Rule 8 (3A) conditions and granted relief to the appellant by waiving the pre-deposit requirements for the appeal hearing, allowing recovery to be stayed. The appellant's challenge against the duty demand, interest, and penalty was partially successful based on the interpretation of the relevant rules and judicial precedents. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 May 2015 07:36:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259181 The Tribunal addressed the non-payment of Central Excise duty by the appellant and the dispute over payment during default periods without utilizing Cenvat credit. It clarified the constitutional validity of Rule 8 (3A) conditions and granted relief to the appellant by waiving the pre-deposit requirements for the appeal hearing, allowing recovery to be stayed. The appellant's challenge against the duty demand, interest, and penalty was partially successful based on the interpretation of the relevant rules and judicial precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259181