<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259167</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence of intentional concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the penalty was canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259167</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence of intentional concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars by the assessee. The appeal by the Assessing Officer was dismissed, and the penalty was canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>