<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 40 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259166</link>
    <description>The case involved issues regarding the disallowance of foreign exchange losses on mark-to-market forward contracts, professional fees paid to a sister concern, and share of common marketing expenses. The Tribunal allowed the foreign exchange loss as a deductible business expense, overturned the disallowance of professional fees, and remanded the issue of marketing expenses for further verification. The Tribunal stressed the importance of consistent accounting practices and fair assessment of legitimate business expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2015 07:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 40 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259166</link>
      <description>The case involved issues regarding the disallowance of foreign exchange losses on mark-to-market forward contracts, professional fees paid to a sister concern, and share of common marketing expenses. The Tribunal allowed the foreign exchange loss as a deductible business expense, overturned the disallowance of professional fees, and remanded the issue of marketing expenses for further verification. The Tribunal stressed the importance of consistent accounting practices and fair assessment of legitimate business expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>