<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 547 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169728</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the State Government&#039;s decision to drop departmental proceedings against Smt. Neera Yadav lacked rationality and ordered the proceedings to continue. The Court emphasized the difference between departmental and criminal proceedings, stating that they can run concurrently unless the criminal charges are complex. The judgment highlighted the need for maintaining discipline in public service and ensuring decisions are reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 547 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169728</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the State Government&#039;s decision to drop departmental proceedings against Smt. Neera Yadav lacked rationality and ordered the proceedings to continue. The Court emphasized the difference between departmental and criminal proceedings, stating that they can run concurrently unless the criminal charges are complex. The judgment highlighted the need for maintaining discipline in public service and ensuring decisions are reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>