https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169726 The Court upheld the legality of the revision of the rate of royalty during the lease, ruling that the lessee had no grounds to object to the increase. It also deemed the cancellation of the lease valid due to the lessee's failure to comply with the factory establishment requirement. Regarding constitutional issues, the Court clarified that once the State enters into a contract, Article 14 does not apply to alleged breaches. Furthermore, the Court reiterated that breaches of contract by the State do not fall under Article 226 jurisdiction, emphasizing the need for ordinary civil suits to address such disputes. The appeals were dismissed, and costs were awarded against the appellants. en-us Thu, 17 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2015 18:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169726 The Court upheld the legality of the revision of the rate of royalty during the lease, ruling that the lessee had no grounds to object to the increase. It also deemed the cancellation of the lease valid due to the lessee's failure to comply with the factory establishment requirement. Regarding constitutional issues, the Court clarified that once the State enters into a contract, Article 14 does not apply to alleged breaches. Furthermore, the Court reiterated that breaches of contract by the State do not fall under Article 226 jurisdiction, emphasizing the need for ordinary civil suits to address such disputes. The appeals were dismissed, and costs were awarded against the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169726