https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169720 The Supreme Court held that the abolition of posts, including the post of Vigilance Commissioner, did not amount to removal under Article 311 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the abolition was a policy decision and not an act of dismissal or removal, lacking penal consequences. The Court further found no evidence of mala fide intent or violation of the principle of estoppel. Additionally, the termination of services due to post abolitions did not violate various constitutional rights, leading to the dismissal of the appeals with each party bearing its own costs. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2015 16:53:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169720 The Supreme Court held that the abolition of posts, including the post of Vigilance Commissioner, did not amount to removal under Article 311 of the Constitution. The Court ruled that the abolition was a policy decision and not an act of dismissal or removal, lacking penal consequences. The Court further found no evidence of mala fide intent or violation of the principle of estoppel. Additionally, the termination of services due to post abolitions did not violate various constitutional rights, leading to the dismissal of the appeals with each party bearing its own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169720