https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169715 Handwriting expert opinion is admissible and need not invariably be corroborated before it can be relied on. The proper approach is to test the expert's reasons with caution, consider the surrounding evidence, and assess whether the opinion remains trustworthy. The Court may also compare disputed writings with admitted or proved writings, because the Evidence Act expressly authorises such comparison. On the facts described, the unshaken expert evidence, judicial comparison of writings, and recovery of the deceased's watch at the appellant's instance were treated as sufficient to connect the appellant with the offences. en-us Wed, 21 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2015 15:17:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169715 Handwriting expert opinion is admissible and need not invariably be corroborated before it can be relied on. The proper approach is to test the expert's reasons with caution, consider the surrounding evidence, and assess whether the opinion remains trustworthy. The Court may also compare disputed writings with admitted or proved writings, because the Evidence Act expressly authorises such comparison. On the facts described, the unshaken expert evidence, judicial comparison of writings, and recovery of the deceased's watch at the appellant's instance were treated as sufficient to connect the appellant with the offences. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169715