https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169703 Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was construed as creating a substantive right whose operation is limited by the transitional scheme in Section 30(1) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984. The majority held that the additional 12% amount is payable only in the cases specifically covered by Section 30(1)(a) and (b), and that a pending reference before the civil court on 24-9-1984 does not by itself extend the benefit beyond those categories. The dissent considered the provision prospective and applicable to all pending references, treating Section 30(1) as not curtailing the main benefit. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2015 14:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169703 Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was construed as creating a substantive right whose operation is limited by the transitional scheme in Section 30(1) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984. The majority held that the additional 12% amount is payable only in the cases specifically covered by Section 30(1)(a) and (b), and that a pending reference before the civil court on 24-9-1984 does not by itself extend the benefit beyond those categories. The dissent considered the provision prospective and applicable to all pending references, treating Section 30(1) as not curtailing the main benefit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Sep 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169703