<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259151</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, finding it within legislative competence and not in violation of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It rejected claims of constitutional rights violations and confirmed Rule 10A&#039;s applicability to the petitioners&#039; transactions with M/s. Tata Motors Limited. The court dismissed the writ petitions without costs but set aside penalties imposed on the petitioners and their directors/officers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 25 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259151</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, finding it within legislative competence and not in violation of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It rejected claims of constitutional rights violations and confirmed Rule 10A&#039;s applicability to the petitioners&#039; transactions with M/s. Tata Motors Limited. The court dismissed the writ petitions without costs but set aside penalties imposed on the petitioners and their directors/officers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>