<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 18 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellants under Sections 114 and 117 of the Customs Act, finding no evidence of their knowledge or malafide intent in the fraudulent export activities. The Tribunal excluded directions for action under Customs House Agents Regulations, deeming them beyond the scope of the appeals. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 18 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed on the appellants under Sections 114 and 117 of the Customs Act, finding no evidence of their knowledge or malafide intent in the fraudulent export activities. The Tribunal excluded directions for action under Customs House Agents Regulations, deeming them beyond the scope of the appeals. The appeals were allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>