<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259137</link>
    <description>The Court held that the assessment made on 28.1.2002 was not time-barred under section 158BE(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the audit period should be excluded from the limitation period. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanding the case for a fair consideration of all other points raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259137</link>
      <description>The Court held that the assessment made on 28.1.2002 was not time-barred under section 158BE(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the audit period should be excluded from the limitation period. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and remanding the case for a fair consideration of all other points raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>