<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259128</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 12,83,290/- imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the penalty was discretionary, not mandatory, and that the department failed to prove concealment. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that the penalty deletion was correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 2 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259128</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 12,83,290/- imposed under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the penalty was discretionary, not mandatory, and that the department failed to prove concealment. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that the penalty deletion was correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>