https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169690 A statutory appeal to the High Court under the Delhi Rent Control Act was held to be governed by the Act's own scheme, and the question was whether a further intra-court appeal under the Letters Patent survived. The Court reasoned that where the statute confers appellate jurisdiction on the High Court and declares the appellate order final, that finality clause excludes both a Letters Patent appeal and collateral challenge unless the statute otherwise permits it. The result was that no Letters Patent appeal lay from the single Judge's decision in the second appeal, and the statutory finality under section 43 barred further appeal. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:12:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169690 A statutory appeal to the High Court under the Delhi Rent Control Act was held to be governed by the Act's own scheme, and the question was whether a further intra-court appeal under the Letters Patent survived. The Court reasoned that where the statute confers appellate jurisdiction on the High Court and declares the appellate order final, that finality clause excludes both a Letters Patent appeal and collateral challenge unless the statute otherwise permits it. The result was that no Letters Patent appeal lay from the single Judge's decision in the second appeal, and the statutory finality under section 43 barred further appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169690