<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 300 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169685</link>
    <description>Rule 8(v) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules did not permit reduction of a directly recruited employee to a lower post never held in his service career. The disciplinary finding of guilt was left undisturbed, but the penalty was held incompetent because the rule scheme did not authorise such a reduction and it would lead to an unreasonable result. If the charges justified a stronger consequence, the permissible course was dismissal or removal from service, not transfer to an unoccupied lower post. The reduction to Daftarband-Attender was quashed and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of punishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 17:20:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 300 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169685</link>
      <description>Rule 8(v) of the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules did not permit reduction of a directly recruited employee to a lower post never held in his service career. The disciplinary finding of guilt was left undisturbed, but the penalty was held incompetent because the rule scheme did not authorise such a reduction and it would lead to an unreasonable result. If the charges justified a stronger consequence, the permissible course was dismissal or removal from service, not transfer to an unoccupied lower post. The reduction to Daftarband-Attender was quashed and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of punishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>