https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169683 A finding on a landlord's bona fide need for non-residential premises is ordinarily one of fact, and the High Court in second appeal may interfere only where the finding is vitiated by an error of law, rests on no evidence, or is perverse; mere disagreement with the first appellate court is insufficient. A landlord seeking eviction under section 12(1)(f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act must prove genuine, objectively assessed need, and a bare assertion is not enough. On the facts stated, the evidence did not establish bona fide requirement, so the eviction decree could not stand. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:20:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169683 A finding on a landlord's bona fide need for non-residential premises is ordinarily one of fact, and the High Court in second appeal may interfere only where the finding is vitiated by an error of law, rests on no evidence, or is perverse; mere disagreement with the first appellate court is insufficient. A landlord seeking eviction under section 12(1)(f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act must prove genuine, objectively assessed need, and a bare assertion is not enough. On the facts stated, the evidence did not establish bona fide requirement, so the eviction decree could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169683