<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169676</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Constitution (17th Amendment) Act, 1964, dismissing the petitions challenging its constitutionality. The Court emphasized that Article 368 grants broad powers to amend the Constitution, including fundamental rights, without being restricted by Article 13(2). Separate opinions expressed differing views on the scope of Article 13(2) and the amendability of fundamental rights, with some reservations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:43:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169676</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Constitution (17th Amendment) Act, 1964, dismissing the petitions challenging its constitutionality. The Court emphasized that Article 368 grants broad powers to amend the Constitution, including fundamental rights, without being restricted by Article 13(2). Separate opinions expressed differing views on the scope of Article 13(2) and the amendability of fundamental rights, with some reservations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>