https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169675 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and Article 32(2A) depends on the person, authority, or Government being within the territorial limits of the High Court, which the majority treated as a factual question of location or residence. The Union Government was held to be situated at New Delhi, so it was not treated as being within the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's territorial reach. The Constitution was also held not to import the civil-law concept of cause of action into writ jurisdiction, and jurisdiction could not be founded merely on where an order took effect or where the cause of action arose. On that reasoning, territorial jurisdiction was unavailable. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:27:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169675 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and Article 32(2A) depends on the person, authority, or Government being within the territorial limits of the High Court, which the majority treated as a factual question of location or residence. The Union Government was held to be situated at New Delhi, so it was not treated as being within the Jammu and Kashmir High Court's territorial reach. The Constitution was also held not to import the civil-law concept of cause of action into writ jurisdiction, and jurisdiction could not be founded merely on where an order took effect or where the cause of action arose. On that reasoning, territorial jurisdiction was unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169675