<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1005 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant franchise, holding that they were correctly discharging tax liability on 80% of the fees received for training services, as the gross value for tax purposes. The lower authorities&#039; decision to impose tax on the full amount received was overturned, emphasizing that the consideration for services provided was accurately accounted for by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous orders and providing clarity on the service tax liability issue related to fees collected under the franchise agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1005 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant franchise, holding that they were correctly discharging tax liability on 80% of the fees received for training services, as the gross value for tax purposes. The lower authorities&#039; decision to impose tax on the full amount received was overturned, emphasizing that the consideration for services provided was accurately accounted for by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous orders and providing clarity on the service tax liability issue related to fees collected under the franchise agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>