<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 991 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259110</link>
    <description>The appeal in this case was dismissed due to a delay in filing caused by a change of address. The appellant sought condonation of the delay, arguing lack of mala fide intent. The Revenue relied on a presumption of service principle, while the appellant referenced a Tribunal case on condonable delays. The judges emphasized the importance of not prematurely dismissing appeals but noted the appellant&#039;s lack of vigilance. Despite legal references and reasons provided, the delay was not excused due to the appellant&#039;s inactivity. As a result, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:10:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 991 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259110</link>
      <description>The appeal in this case was dismissed due to a delay in filing caused by a change of address. The appellant sought condonation of the delay, arguing lack of mala fide intent. The Revenue relied on a presumption of service principle, while the appellant referenced a Tribunal case on condonable delays. The judges emphasized the importance of not prematurely dismissing appeals but noted the appellant&#039;s lack of vigilance. Despite legal references and reasons provided, the delay was not excused due to the appellant&#039;s inactivity. As a result, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the stay application and appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>