<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 986 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259105</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court allowed the application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the need for meetings of equity shareholders and creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies based in New Delhi. The Scheme aimed at operational efficiency and business growth, with unanimous approval from the Board of Directors and written consent from equity shareholders. As there were no pending proceedings or creditors, the Court approved the Scheme without the requirement for shareholder and creditor meetings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 986 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259105</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court allowed the application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the need for meetings of equity shareholders and creditors for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies based in New Delhi. The Scheme aimed at operational efficiency and business growth, with unanimous approval from the Board of Directors and written consent from equity shareholders. As there were no pending proceedings or creditors, the Court approved the Scheme without the requirement for shareholder and creditor meetings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>