<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 983 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259102</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s ruling that the business was set up and had commenced in the preceding year. It emphasized the difference between setting up a business and the actual commencement of income-generating activities. The judgment clarified that business initiation occurs when activities are ready to start, not necessarily when revenue is generated, and found no legal grounds to intervene in the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 983 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259102</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s ruling that the business was set up and had commenced in the preceding year. It emphasized the difference between setting up a business and the actual commencement of income-generating activities. The judgment clarified that business initiation occurs when activities are ready to start, not necessarily when revenue is generated, and found no legal grounds to intervene in the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>