<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 977 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259096</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the explanations provided by the respondent-Assessee were accepted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s challenge under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal emphasized that failure to prove liability does not amount to inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:08:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 977 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259096</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, as the explanations provided by the respondent-Assessee were accepted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s challenge under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal emphasized that failure to prove liability does not amount to inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>