https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169672 Deficit court fee could not be used to defeat enhanced compensation already found payable on the merits, and claimants were allowed to make up the shortfall and receive the higher award. Section 30(2) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 was construed retrospectively to extend the amended provisions on solatium and interest to awards and appellate orders made after 30 April 1982 and before commencement of the amending Act. Because an appeal in compensation matters is a continuation of the original proceedings, pending appeals had to be decided with the amended statutory additions. en-us Wed, 14 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:16:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169672 Deficit court fee could not be used to defeat enhanced compensation already found payable on the merits, and claimants were allowed to make up the shortfall and receive the higher award. Section 30(2) of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 was construed retrospectively to extend the amended provisions on solatium and interest to awards and appellate orders made after 30 April 1982 and before commencement of the amending Act. Because an appeal in compensation matters is a continuation of the original proceedings, pending appeals had to be decided with the amended statutory additions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169672