<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (12) TMI 1 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169666</link>
    <description>Waqf beneficiaries with definite and determinable shares were not to be assessed as an association of persons. Where each beneficiary&#039;s share in the relevant accounting year was equal and separately computable, the first proviso to section 41(1) did not apply because the shares were neither indeterminate nor unknown. Tax therefore had to be computed separately on each beneficiary&#039;s share of income at the rate applicable to that beneficiary&#039;s total income, and the mutawalli was liable on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (12) TMI 1 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169666</link>
      <description>Waqf beneficiaries with definite and determinable shares were not to be assessed as an association of persons. Where each beneficiary&#039;s share in the relevant accounting year was equal and separately computable, the first proviso to section 41(1) did not apply because the shares were neither indeterminate nor unknown. Tax therefore had to be computed separately on each beneficiary&#039;s share of income at the rate applicable to that beneficiary&#039;s total income, and the mutawalli was liable on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>