<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Criticizes Appellant for Misusing Promissory Estoppel, Urges Full Context Evaluation in Seizure Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22731</link>
    <description>Seizure of goods - promissory estoppel - appellant instead of addressing the questions culled out by us in the aforesaid order again started arguing the plea of estoppel - The appellant cannot pick a line here and a line there, out of context and impute a motive, which a reading of the whole document does not disclose - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:32:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:32:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Criticizes Appellant for Misusing Promissory Estoppel, Urges Full Context Evaluation in Seizure Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22731</link>
      <description>Seizure of goods - promissory estoppel - appellant instead of addressing the questions culled out by us in the aforesaid order again started arguing the plea of estoppel - The appellant cannot pick a line here and a line there, out of context and impute a motive, which a reading of the whole document does not disclose - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:32:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>