https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259077 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, finding that the Commissioner (Appeals) incorrectly based the decision on the prospective application of Explanation III to Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The case was remanded for reconsideration of limitation and Revenue neutrality issues, along with a directive for a proper opportunity of hearing before the order is passed. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2015 07:47:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259077 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, finding that the Commissioner (Appeals) incorrectly based the decision on the prospective application of Explanation III to Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The case was remanded for reconsideration of limitation and Revenue neutrality issues, along with a directive for a proper opportunity of hearing before the order is passed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259077