<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 951 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259070</link>
    <description>Share transfers in an Indian company remain subject to the Companies Act, 1956 and the company&#039;s Articles of Association, even where a sale occurs through foreign insolvency proceedings. Transfer restrictions and shareholders&#039; pre-emptive rights require compliance with the company&#039;s internal requirements. Waiver requires clear knowledge of the relevant right and intentional relinquishment; acquiescence and estoppel similarly require informed assent. Delay must be assessed against the timing of knowledge and surrounding circumstances. Post-sale conduct alone does not establish waiver, acquiescence or estoppel where the shareholder lacked timely knowledge of the proposed transfer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 951 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259070</link>
      <description>Share transfers in an Indian company remain subject to the Companies Act, 1956 and the company&#039;s Articles of Association, even where a sale occurs through foreign insolvency proceedings. Transfer restrictions and shareholders&#039; pre-emptive rights require compliance with the company&#039;s internal requirements. Waiver requires clear knowledge of the relevant right and intentional relinquishment; acquiescence and estoppel similarly require informed assent. Delay must be assessed against the timing of knowledge and surrounding circumstances. Post-sale conduct alone does not establish waiver, acquiescence or estoppel where the shareholder lacked timely knowledge of the proposed transfer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>