<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 943 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259062</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that disallowing interest under Section 43B should be subsumed into the offer of waived principal to avoid double jeopardy for the assessee. The Court emphasized that taxing both the waived principal and disallowed interest separately would lead to the same tax liability, thus rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for separate taxation. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 943 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259062</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that disallowing interest under Section 43B should be subsumed into the offer of waived principal to avoid double jeopardy for the assessee. The Court emphasized that taxing both the waived principal and disallowed interest separately would lead to the same tax liability, thus rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for separate taxation. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>