https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169632 The Court found in favor of the petitioners, declaring the promotions granted to certain individuals as contrary to the Constitution. It emphasized the distinction between reservations for backward classes and arbitrary distribution based on community or residence. The Court allowed the State to create a new reservation scheme in compliance with constitutional provisions. The petitioners were awarded costs, highlighting a victory against discriminatory promotion practices based on religion and place of residence. The judgment underscored the importance of balancing equality provisions and reservation policies for fair representation in public employment. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 14:16:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169632 The Court found in favor of the petitioners, declaring the promotions granted to certain individuals as contrary to the Constitution. It emphasized the distinction between reservations for backward classes and arbitrary distribution based on community or residence. The Court allowed the State to create a new reservation scheme in compliance with constitutional provisions. The petitioners were awarded costs, highlighting a victory against discriminatory promotion practices based on religion and place of residence. The judgment underscored the importance of balancing equality provisions and reservation policies for fair representation in public employment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169632