https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169626 A foreign judgment remained enforceable by suit because evacuee legislation did not establish that the decree-holder had lost entitlement to sue, and no statutory exception to conclusiveness was shown. The suit was also within time because the period spent in bona fide earlier execution proceedings, which failed for want of jurisdiction, was excluded under the Limitation Act. A court deposit made pursuant to a stay order and consistently treated by both sides as earmarked for the decree had to be credited equitably towards satisfaction, so only the balance remained recoverable with appropriate interest and costs. en-us Thu, 17 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169626 A foreign judgment remained enforceable by suit because evacuee legislation did not establish that the decree-holder had lost entitlement to sue, and no statutory exception to conclusiveness was shown. The suit was also within time because the period spent in bona fide earlier execution proceedings, which failed for want of jurisdiction, was excluded under the Limitation Act. A court deposit made pursuant to a stay order and consistently treated by both sides as earmarked for the decree had to be credited equitably towards satisfaction, so only the balance remained recoverable with appropriate interest and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169626