<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 468 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169619</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, emphasizing the nature of &#039;dividend&#039; paid to chit subscribers and the absence of a requirement to deduct TDS. The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the dismissal of the ground of appeal by the assessee on income from business, the Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders, directing a reexamination by the assessing officer with allowance for necessary evidence. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 468 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169619</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the assessee concerning the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, emphasizing the nature of &#039;dividend&#039; paid to chit subscribers and the absence of a requirement to deduct TDS. The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Regarding the dismissal of the ground of appeal by the assessee on income from business, the Tribunal set aside lower authorities&#039; orders, directing a reexamination by the assessing officer with allowance for necessary evidence. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>