<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259043</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving a sugar manufacturer and exporter who violated the Customs Act by exporting sugar without obtaining Export Release Orders. The penalties imposed under Sections 114(i) and 114(AA) were reduced by the Tribunal, a decision challenged by the Commissioner Customs, NOIDA. The Court found the penalty reduction fair, emphasizing the necessity of physically incorporating imported input in the export product. The penalties were upheld as justified, with no legal questions arising from the case. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties based on Customs Act violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 924 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259043</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving a sugar manufacturer and exporter who violated the Customs Act by exporting sugar without obtaining Export Release Orders. The penalties imposed under Sections 114(i) and 114(AA) were reduced by the Tribunal, a decision challenged by the Commissioner Customs, NOIDA. The Court found the penalty reduction fair, emphasizing the necessity of physically incorporating imported input in the export product. The penalties were upheld as justified, with no legal questions arising from the case. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the penalties based on Customs Act violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>