<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 915 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The addition made under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act was deleted as there was no evidence of unexplained expenditure. Transactions were conducted through banking channels, accounted for in books, profits declared, and taxes paid, leading to the conclusion that Section 69C was not applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 915 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The addition made under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act was deleted as there was no evidence of unexplained expenditure. Transactions were conducted through banking channels, accounted for in books, profits declared, and taxes paid, leading to the conclusion that Section 69C was not applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>